top of page
Writer's pictureJessica Scipio

Culley v. Marshall

No. 22-585





Docketed:December 23, 2022


Linked with 22A428 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Case Numbers: (21-13805, 21-13484)


Decision Date:July 11, 2022

Rehearing Denied: August 30, 2022


Issue


Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. Wingo or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge.

2 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page