top of page

Culley v. Marshall

Writer's picture: Jessica ScipioJessica Scipio

No. 22-585





Docketed:December 23, 2022


Linked with 22A428 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Case Numbers: (21-13805, 21-13484)


Decision Date:July 11, 2022

Rehearing Denied: August 30, 2022


Issue


Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. Wingo or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge.

2 views0 comments

留言


Office Hours Availability

40 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005

Virtual 24 Hrs. 

Telephone: 1-929-469-2583

bottom of page